Daily Productive Sharing 164 - Why Is Remote Work Both Beneficial to Employees and Employers?
One helpful tip per day:)
(The English version follows)
上周的 Daily Productive Sharing 159 - 20210324 中提到，英国智库建议将远程办公作为默认工作方式，因为这种模式会对当地的经济产生不小的变化；今天的分享就从雇佣者和被雇佣者两方面来分析这种模式的好处。 别忘了把今天的文章分享给你的老板:)
如果你想更好地管理时间，并且减轻自己的压力，不妨试试 BRNR List
如果你也想成为更高效的人，欢迎加入我们的 TG group
如果大家使用邮件订阅，请把 firstname.lastname@example.org 添加为邮箱联系人，避免邮箱过滤的误伤，谢谢:)
Last week's Daily Productive Sharing 159 - 20210324 mentioned that a UK think tank recommended remote work as the default way of working as this model would make a not insignificant difference to the local economy; today's sharing looks at the benefits of this model from both the employees and the employers. Don't forget to share today's article with your boss :)
If you find today's sharing helpful, why not share it with your friends?
Try our sustainable productivity tool BRNR List
Please add email@example.com as your contact to avoid mislabeling the newsletter as spam.
These gains go to the employee initially.
The dollars and time spent commuting.
At least some of the cost of daycare.
The cost in space/and or dollars of having to live close to work.
Eating lunch out.
Dressing below the waist.
And these to the employer.
The cost of owning or renting office space.
The cost of people devoted to maintenance of the office space (see Dropbox above).
Any subsidy including parking spaces supporting commuting.
The need to provide free coffee etc.
Pressman quotes a study Dropbox commissioned at The Economist which concluded that workers lose 28% of their productivity because of distractions and says this agrees with my estimate that 25 hours at home is equivalent to a 9-5 day at the office (nit, he somewhat misinterpreted the study).
WfH is not a zero-sum game. Both workers and employers benefit.